Skip to main content
Start of main content.

Assessment

Assessment timetable

  • Applications for deferring Mid-semester Timed Assessments scheduled in Week 6-8, or Final Timed Assessments scheduled in Week 13-14, must be lodged with the Student Assist before the assessment starts or within two (2) working days following the day of the scheduled assessment (Assessment Policy)
  • For other interim assessments that are eligible to be deferred, you will be required to contact the relevant academic staff member from your Faculty to apply.

Read more

  • You will be able to view your results on eStudent from the Monday of Orientation Week.
  • Contact the relevant department if a sanction is preventing you from accessing your results.
  • Contact Student Accounts for a fee sanction.
  • Contact the Library for a library sanction.
  • For all other sanctions contact the Student Assist.

Review of Results

If you believe your mark for an assessment does not accurately reflect how well you performed, you may be able to apply for a review. 

A review allows for your assessment to be looked at by a different educator and address any specific concerns raised by you about the assessment. This process focuses only on specific concerns you raise about how your assessment was marked. It is not a way to get more feedback. If you want feedback, please contact your lead educator, discipline lead, or the SASQ team in your Faculty or University Academic Unit (UAU).

A Review of Results will result in one of the following:

  • no change to the mark; or 
  • a higher mark awarded for the assessment; or
  • a lower mark awarded for the assessment.

Where a higher or lower mark results from a review, this may affect your overall grade for the subject.

When applying, you will need to confirm that you have read the Review of Results Procedure.

Before seeking a review, you should know that there is a limited window for applying (see the Review of Interim Assessment or Review of Final Assessment sections below). 

There are also only limited grounds for requesting a review. You must demonstrate that:

  • there were computational, arithmetical or other clerical errors in the determination of the assessment mark, including that the weightings specified by the subject outline were incorrect; or
  • the assessment was not conducted or graded in accordance with published University policy, procedure, or assessment criteria; or
  • the marker or assessor had a conflict of interest or acted with bias during the grading process.

Once you apply, your submission will be checked to see if it meets the eligibility criteria (see the Conditions and Limitations section below). If your application is not eligible, your assessment wonโ€™t be reviewed, and youโ€™ll be notified in writing with the reason. If your application is rejected, you canโ€™t resubmit or appeal the decision.