General Information
This subject introduces students to the mechanics of financial markets and institutions. The emphasis is on how markets work, how instruments are priced and how they are traded. The subject covers the evolution of financial institutions both in Australia and internationally, their roles and response to regulations and deregulation. The subject also considers the types and functions of financial intermediaries.
-
Details
Academic unit: Bond Business School Subject code: FINC13-304 Subject title: Financial Markets and Institutions Subject level: Undergraduate Semester/Year: May 2017 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Standard Workload items: - Lecture: x12 (Total hours: 24) - Weekly Lecture
- Tutorial: x11 (Total hours: 22) - Weekly Tutorial
Attendance and learning activities: -
Resources
Prescribed resources: Books
- Christopher Viney,Peter John Phillips (2015). Financial Institutions, Instruments and Markets. 7th, Australia NSW McGraw-Hill
- David S. Kidwell,Mark Brimble,Liam J. A. Lenten,Anup Basu,Paul Docherty,Paul Mazzola (2014). Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 3rd, United States McGraw-Hill Education
Journals
- A. K. Bera and M. L. Higgins (1993). ARCH models: properties, estimation and testing. J. Economic Surveys 20 Available at: http://stats.lse.ac.uk/fryzlewicz/lec_notes/garch.pdf
iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Academic unit: | Bond Business School |
---|---|
Subject code: | FINC13-304 |
Subject title: | Financial Markets and Institutions |
Subject level: | Undergraduate |
Semester/Year: | May 2017 |
Credit points: | 10.000 |
Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
---|---|
Delivery mode: | Standard |
Workload items: |
|
Attendance and learning activities: |
Prescribed resources: | Books
Journals
|
---|---|
iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
Requisites: |
Pre-requisites:Co-requisites:There are no co-requisites |
---|---|
Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge.
|
Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Discuss the main participants in the Australian financial system and their roles.
- Explain the main features of a modern financial system, with particular emphasis on the role of financial intermediaries.
- Explain the structure and purpose of both the public and private equity markets.
- Describe the characteristics of different types of debt securities and be able to price them.
- Describe different theories of interest rate determination and explain the relationship between term to maturity, risk and interest rates.
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different measures of investment risk, and how the distribution of returns influences the assessment of risk.
- Understand the nature and importance of risk management, with particular reference to the use of futures, forwards and swaps in managing specific risk exposures.
- Describe the role of regulatory authorities in regulating how financial intermediaries manage their capital, and discuss the recent changes in international regulation on capital adequacy.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Essay Final Examination 40% Final Examination Period *In-Class Quiz - Individual Concept Test 30% Week 6 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 Essay§ Group Assignment 20% Week 10 *Class Participation n/a 10% Weekly - § Indicates group/teamwork-based assessment
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Essay | Final Examination | 40% | Final Examination Period | |
*In-Class Quiz - Individual | Concept Test | 30% | Week 6 | 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 |
Essay§ | Group Assignment | 20% | Week 10 | |
*Class Participation | n/a | 10% | Weekly |
- § Indicates group/teamwork-based assessment
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
---|---|---|
Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Academic Integrity
University’s Academic Integrity Policy defines plagiarism as the act of misrepresenting as one’s own original work: another’s ideas, interpretations, words, or creative works; and/or one’s own previous ideas, interpretations, words, or creative work without acknowledging that it was used previously (i.e., self-plagiarism). The University considers the act of plagiarising to be a breach of the Student Conduct Code and, therefore, subject to the Discipline Regulations which provide for a range of penalties including the reduction of marks or grades, fines and suspension from the University.
Bond University utilises Originality Reporting software to inform academic integrity.Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, as per the Assessment Policy.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
If you have a disability, illness, injury or health condition that impacts your capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks, it is important you let us know your special requirements, early in the semester. Students will need to make an application for support and submit it with recent, comprehensive documentation at an appointment with a Disability Officer. Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Office at the earliest possible time, to meet staff and learn about the services available to meet your specific needs. Please note that late notification or failure to disclose your disability can be to your disadvantage as the University cannot guarantee support under such circumstances.
Additional subject information
Subject curriculum
-
Weekly topic outline
Week 01 01: Overview of a Modern Financial System; Week 02 02: Financial Intermediaries; Week 03 03: Interest Rate Determination; Week 04 04: Short Term Debt; Week 05 05: Long Term Debt; Week 06 06: Volatility of Financial Markets; Week 07 07: Concept Test; Week 08 08: Measurement of Risk; Week 09 09: Risk Management: Futures and Forwards; Week 10 10: Introduction and Mechanics of Options Markets; Week 11 11: Risk Management: Swaps ; Week 12 12: Regulation and Deregulation; Week 13 REVIEW; Week 14 FINAL EXAM.
SLOs included
- Discuss the main participants in the Australian financial system and their roles.
- Explain the main features of a modern financial system, with particular emphasis on the role of financial intermediaries.
- Explain the structure and purpose of both the public and private equity markets.
- Describe the characteristics of different types of debt securities and be able to price them.
- Describe different theories of interest rate determination and explain the relationship between term to maturity, risk and interest rates.
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different measures of investment risk, and how the distribution of returns influences the assessment of risk.
- Understand the nature and importance of risk management, with particular reference to the use of futures, forwards and swaps in managing specific risk exposures.
- Describe the role of regulatory authorities in regulating how financial intermediaries manage their capital, and discuss the recent changes in international regulation on capital adequacy.
-
n/a
n/a