Nutrition Issues and Priorities

General Information

This subject explores historical, contemporary and future food and nutrition issues and priorities in developing and developed countries. It critically examines the etiology of these challenges from a food and nutrition system perspective and the economic, social, environmental and individual physical burden of diet-related disease and disability. This subject develops pre-requisite knowledge and critical reasoning skills relevant to evidence based decision making in nutrition and dietetic practice.

  • Academic unit: Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine
    Subject code: NUTR71-103
    Subject title: Nutrition Issues and Priorities
    Subject level: Postgraduate
    Semester/Year: May 2023
    Credit points: 10.000
  • Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable
    Delivery mode: Standard
    Workload items:
    • Workshop: x12 (Total hours: 60) - Workshop incorporates topic content, activities and discussion
    • Personal Study Hours: x12 (Total hours: 60) - Self-directed reading and preparation for class activities and assessment task completion
    Attendance and learning activities: Students must attend all sessions (including remote classes, if approved). Most sessions build on the work from the previous one. It is difficult to recover if a session is missed. Attendance in classes will be monitored (including remote classes). If a student has a legitimate reason for non-attendance they must notify the subject convenor as early as possible and provide documentation (i.e. absence form, medical certificate, statutory declaration). Participation in all classes is required in order to demonstrate professional competence. This subject includes Compulsory Learning Activities. Students must attend and participate in all Compulsory Learning Activities and attend 80% of classes (including remote classes) to pass the subject. The following ACEND core knowledge and competencies are mapped as 'introduced' in this subject – KRDN1.1, KRDN1.2, CRDN1.3, KRDN2.2, KRDN2.3, KRDN2.4, KRDN2.6, KRDN2.7, CRDN2.1, CRDN2.14, KRDN4.6. The assessment task description provides details of the assessments each of these is mapped to.
  • Prescribed resources:

    Books

    • Lawrence, M., & Worsley, A. (2007). Public Health Nutrition: From Principles to Practice. n/a, Allen & Unwin
    After enrolment, students can check the Books and Tools area in iLearn for the full Resource List.
    iLearn@Bond & Email:

    iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications.

    Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student.

    To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Academic unit: Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine
Subject code: NUTR71-103
Subject title: Nutrition Issues and Priorities
Subject level: Postgraduate
Semester/Year: May 2023
Credit points: 10.000

Enrolment requirements

Requisites:

Nil
Assumed knowledge:

Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge.

Restrictions:

Nil

Assurance of learning

Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.

At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.

Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)

Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.

Find your program

Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)

On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:

  1. Describe personal, social, cultural, psychological, and environmental factors influencing food and food use, food habits and diet and lifestyle.
  2. Describe past, current and future food- and nutrition-related health issues and priorities in Australia and internationally.
  3. Describe the impact of healthcare systems and public policy on nutrition and dietetic practice.
  4. Analyse the determinants and potential interventions for diet-related disease using socio-ecological analytical frameworks.
  5. Describe food systems and the nutritional implications of changes to the food supply on individuals, groups and populations.
  6. Describe cultural awareness, nutrition issues and current policy and implementation frameworks for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and other culturally and linguistically diverse communities.
  7. Describe the governance of dietetic practice, including professional regulation, scope and ethical practice requirements.

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment

The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.

  • Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed
    Written Report Problem and Determinants Analysis Report, 2000 words. This assessment is associated with ACEND core knowledge KRDN2.6. A full description of this core knowledge component can be found on the Program's community iLearn site. 40.00% Week 6 1,2,3,4,6
    Written Report Intervention Research Report, 2000 words. This assessment is associated with ACEND core knowledge and competencies KRDN1.1, KRDN1.2, CRDN1.3, and KRDN2.3. A full description of these can be found on the Program's community iLearn site. 40.00% Week 13 1,2,3,4,6
    Computer-aided Test (Closed) A series of 4 x 5% quizzes to assess knowledge gained through prescribed reading and classes. Quizzes will be held in Weeks 3, 6, 9 and 12. This assessment maps to ACEND core knowledge and competencies KRDN2.2, KRDN2.4, KRDN2.7, CRDN2.1, and CRDN2.14.(Full description on iLearn, Program community) 20.00% Ongoing 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
    • * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
    • C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.

  • Assessment criteria

    High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking.
    Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas.
    Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above.
    Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment.
    Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines.

    Quality assurance

    For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.

Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed
Written Report Problem and Determinants Analysis Report, 2000 words. This assessment is associated with ACEND core knowledge KRDN2.6. A full description of this core knowledge component can be found on the Program's community iLearn site. 40.00% Week 6 1,2,3,4,6
Written Report Intervention Research Report, 2000 words. This assessment is associated with ACEND core knowledge and competencies KRDN1.1, KRDN1.2, CRDN1.3, and KRDN2.3. A full description of these can be found on the Program's community iLearn site. 40.00% Week 13 1,2,3,4,6
Computer-aided Test (Closed) A series of 4 x 5% quizzes to assess knowledge gained through prescribed reading and classes. Quizzes will be held in Weeks 3, 6, 9 and 12. This assessment maps to ACEND core knowledge and competencies KRDN2.2, KRDN2.4, KRDN2.7, CRDN2.1, and CRDN2.14.(Full description on iLearn, Program community) 20.00% Ongoing 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
  • * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
  • C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.

Study Information

Submission procedures

Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.

Policy on late submission and extensions

A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.

Academic Integrity

Bond University‘s Student Code of Conduct Policy , Student Charter, Academic Integrity Policy and our Graduate Attributes guide expectations regarding student behaviour, their rights and responsibilities. Information on these topics can be found on our Academic Integrity webpage recognising that academic integrity involves demonstrating the principles of integrity (honesty, fairness, trust, professionalism, courage, responsibility, and respect) in words and actions across all aspects of academic endeavour.

Staff are required to report suspected misconduct. This includes all types of plagiarism, cheating, collusion, fabrication or falsification of data/content or other misconduct relating to assessment such as the falsification of medical certificates for assessment extensions. The longer term personal, social and financial consequences of misconduct can be severe, so please ask for help if you are unsure.

If your work is subject to an inquiry, you will be given an opportunity to respond and appropriate support will be provided. Academic work under inquiry will not be marked until the process has concluded. Penalties for misconduct include a warning, reduced grade, a requirement to repeat the assessment, suspension or expulsion from the University.

Feedback on assessment

Feedback on assessment will be provided to students according to the requirements of the Assessment Procedure Schedule A - Assessment Communication Procedure.

Whilst in most cases feedback should be provided within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, the Procedure should be checked if the assessment is linked to others or if the subject is a non-standard (e.g., intensive) subject.

Accessibility and Inclusion Support

Support is available to students where a physical, mental or neurological condition exists that would impact the student’s capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks. For effective support, special requirement needs should be arranged with the University in advance of or at the start of each semester, or, for acute conditions, as soon as practicable after the condition arises. Reasonable adjustments are not guaranteed where applications are submitted late in the semester (for example, when lodged just prior to critical assessment and examination dates).

As outlined in the Accessibility and Inclusion Policy, to qualify for support, students must meet certain criteria. Students are also required to meet with the Accessibility and Inclusion Advisor who will ensure that reasonable adjustments are afforded to qualifying students.

For more information and to apply online, visit BondAbility.

Additional subject information

Subject curriculum

Approved on: Feb 23, 2023. Edition: 3.2
Last updated: May 9, 2023
By browsing this site you accept that cookies are used to improve and personalise our services to you for a better experience on our website and for social activity. If you continue, we will assume that you agree to our use of cookies statement
I Agree