General Information
Evidence is a compulsory subject in the Juris Doctor program offered by the Faculty of Law. The subject examines the law and practice relating to evidence in civil and criminal proceedings, focusing on substantive admissibility and procedural rules. Topics covered include basic principles and categories of evidence, competence, compellability and examination of witnesses, privilege, the hearsay rule and its exceptions, admissions and confessions, and illegally obtained evidence. Emphasis is placed on the demonstration of the following skills: legal research and reasoning, and oral communication and advocacy. |
-
Details
Academic unit: Faculty of Law Subject code: LAWS75-318 Subject title: Evidence Subject level: Postgraduate Semester/Year: May 2019 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Standard Workload items: - Lecture: x12 (Total hours: 24) - Weekly Lecture
- Tutorial: x12 (Total hours: 12) - Weekly Tutorial
- Personal Study Hours: x12 (Total hours: 84) - Recommended Study Hours
Attendance and learning activities: You should attend all classes. Most classes build on the work of the previous one, and it may be difficult for you to recover if you miss a class. Attendance in tutorials will be monitored, and missing tutorials may have an impact upon your final mark in this subject. It is strongly recommended that students attend all lectures. Though lectures may be streamed, no guarantee is given that the technology will deliver each lecture and streaming should be used ONLY as a backup in case of illness or as a tool for revision. -
Resources
Prescribed resources: Books
- David Field (2017). Queensland Evidence Law. 4th, Lexis Nexis
Others
- Evidence Act 1977 (Qld). Available at: https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/E/EvidceA77.pdf
iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Academic unit: | Faculty of Law |
---|---|
Subject code: | LAWS75-318 |
Subject title: | Evidence |
Subject level: | Postgraduate |
Semester/Year: | May 2019 |
Credit points: | 10.000 |
Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
---|---|
Delivery mode: | Standard |
Workload items: |
|
Attendance and learning activities: | You should attend all classes. Most classes build on the work of the previous one, and it may be difficult for you to recover if you miss a class. Attendance in tutorials will be monitored, and missing tutorials may have an impact upon your final mark in this subject. It is strongly recommended that students attend all lectures. Though lectures may be streamed, no guarantee is given that the technology will deliver each lecture and streaming should be used ONLY as a backup in case of illness or as a tool for revision. |
Prescribed resources: | Books
Others
|
---|---|
iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
Requisites: |
Nil |
---|---|
Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge. Assumed Prior Learning (or equivalent):
|
Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Demonstrate advanced and integrated understanding of the principles which govern the admission of evidence in both criminal and civil proceedings.
- Demonstrate competency in exercising the following skills at an advanced level, with creativity, initiative and autonomy: • legal research and reasoning; and • oral communication and advocacy.
- Adhere to the highest standards of professionalism, including a commitment to: • learning and working autonomously, accountably and reflectively; • behaving ethically and responsibly; and • managing time effectively and meeting deadlines.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Paper-based Examination (Limited Open) Final examination 60% Final Examination Period 1,2,3 Moot Skills Assessment – Legal research and reasoning, and Oral communication and advocacy (Moot – Evidence Motion) 20% Week 9 1,2,3 *Class Participation Tutorial participation 20% Ongoing 1,2,3 - * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Paper-based Examination (Limited Open) | Final examination | 60% | Final Examination Period | 1,2,3 |
Moot | Skills Assessment – Legal research and reasoning, and Oral communication and advocacy (Moot – Evidence Motion) | 20% | Week 9 | 1,2,3 |
*Class Participation | Tutorial participation | 20% | Ongoing | 1,2,3 |
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
---|---|---|
Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Academic Integrity
University’s Academic Integrity Policy defines plagiarism as the act of misrepresenting as one’s own original work: another’s ideas, interpretations, words, or creative works; and/or one’s own previous ideas, interpretations, words, or creative work without acknowledging that it was used previously (i.e., self-plagiarism). The University considers the act of plagiarising to be a breach of the Student Conduct Code and, therefore, subject to the Discipline Regulations which provide for a range of penalties including the reduction of marks or grades, fines and suspension from the University.
Bond University utilises Originality Reporting software to inform academic integrity.Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, as per the Assessment Policy.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
If you have a disability, illness, injury or health condition that impacts your capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks, it is important you let us know your special requirements, early in the semester. Students will need to make an application for support and submit it with recent, comprehensive documentation at an appointment with a Disability Officer. Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Office at the earliest possible time, to meet staff and learn about the services available to meet your specific needs. Please note that late notification or failure to disclose your disability can be to your disadvantage as the University cannot guarantee support under such circumstances.
Additional subject information
NOTE: This is a compulsory law subject that is required for both LLB and JD students. More details will be posted on iLearn prior to the start of the semester.
Subject curriculum
-
Introduction
Relevance; Admissibility; Weight.
-
Categories of evidence, proof without fresh evidence
Presumptions; Judicial Notice; Estoppel.
-
Competence and compellability
Oral evidence by witnesses; who can be called and compelled to give evidence.
-
The course of a trial
Examination in chief; Cross-examination; Re-examination.
-
Evidence by an accused person;
Evidence from a sexual offence victim
Can the accused testify; limits on (cross-)examination of particular witnesses; evidence from sexual offence victims.
-
Probativeness versus prejudice
Including propensity, similar fact evidence, character evidence, and other forms of prejudicial evidence.
-
Privilege
The privilege against self-incrimination; legal professional privilege; other privileges.
-
Illegally obtained evidence (including admissions and confessions)
The discretion to exclude illegal evidence; the fairness discretion; policy and practice.
-
Hearsay at common law (including res gestae)
Relevance; categories of exclusion of relevant evidence according to common law. Corroboration.
-
Hearsay under statute
The statutory exceptions in Queensland.
-
Expert evidence
Exclusion of opinion evidence; the exception for expert evidence. Identification.
-
Revision
Exam preparation.