General Information
This subject investigates the new dynamics in foreign policy, economics, culture, and security issues that are affecting Australasia in the broader Asian, Pacific and Indian Ocean contexts. The subject begins with a brief outline of Australian foreign affairs and defense policy, then moves on to Australia's contemporary regional setting. Australia has sought to deepen its ties with East and Southeast Asia but in recent years has also become aware of the future impact of India and South Asia as a whole. Changing security concerns have also complicated dialogue with Indonesia and China, transformed within the context of relations with a United States that is re-engaging the region. Relations with small and developing nations within the Asia-Pacific are also noted, e.g. with the Pacific Islands and Southeast Asian states. It assesses regional organizations such as APEC (the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation process), ASEAN (Association of South-East Asian Nations), the ASEAN Regional Forum, CSCAP (Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific), and the East Asia Summit (EAS). Australia has experienced radically changing responsibilities in regard to its regional and global roles. Economic, environmental and energy concerns are interlinked in this region, needing careful calibration for future development.
-
Details
Academic unit: Faculty of Society & Design Subject code: INTR13-305 Subject title: Australia and the Asia-Pacific Subject level: Undergraduate Semester/Year: May 2020 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Standard Workload items: - Lecture: x12 (Total hours: 24) - Weekly Lecture
- Tutorial: x12 (Total hours: 12) - Weekly Tutorial
- Personal Study Hours: x1 (Total hours: 84) - Recommended study hours
Attendance and learning activities: Students need to take an active part in class discussion and seminars. Recommended effective engagement is 80% of total contact time. Please contact the coordinator if you have special factors affecting participation. -
Resources
Prescribed resources: Journals
- Ferguson (2019). Articles and Resources provided via iLearn.
iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Academic unit: | Faculty of Society & Design |
---|---|
Subject code: | INTR13-305 |
Subject title: | Australia and the Asia-Pacific |
Subject level: | Undergraduate |
Semester/Year: | May 2020 |
Credit points: | 10.000 |
Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
---|---|
Delivery mode: | Standard |
Workload items: |
|
Attendance and learning activities: | Students need to take an active part in class discussion and seminars. Recommended effective engagement is 80% of total contact time. Please contact the coordinator if you have special factors affecting participation. |
Prescribed resources: | Journals
|
---|---|
iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
Requisites: |
Nil |
---|---|
Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge.
|
Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Research, presentation skills, Lead group discussion.
- Research, analysis, specialised knowledge, academic writing and referencing.
- Knowledge of subject, building arguments, drawing conclusions.
- Team work, participation.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Computer-aided Test (Open) Take home test covering issues discussed in weeks 1-9. 30% Week 10 2,3 Project Research or Policy Paper: Students prepare and present a policy paper from a range of subject themes agreed on by week 2. Part 1: Work in Progress Webinar 10% (Weeks 2-8) Part 2: Final Report Submission: 50% (Week 11) 60% Week 11 1,2,3,4 *Online Participation Participation in online sessions and session discussion 10% Ongoing 1,2,3,4 - * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Computer-aided Test (Open) | Take home test covering issues discussed in weeks 1-9. | 30% | Week 10 | 2,3 |
Project | Research or Policy Paper: Students prepare and present a policy paper from a range of subject themes agreed on by week 2. Part 1: Work in Progress Webinar 10% (Weeks 2-8) Part 2: Final Report Submission: 50% (Week 11) | 60% | Week 11 | 1,2,3,4 |
*Online Participation | Participation in online sessions and session discussion | 10% | Ongoing | 1,2,3,4 |
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
---|---|---|
Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Academic Integrity
University’s Academic Integrity Policy defines plagiarism as the act of misrepresenting as one’s own original work: another’s ideas, interpretations, words, or creative works; and/or one’s own previous ideas, interpretations, words, or creative work without acknowledging that it was used previously (i.e., self-plagiarism). The University considers the act of plagiarising to be a breach of the Student Conduct Code and, therefore, subject to the Discipline Regulations which provide for a range of penalties including the reduction of marks or grades, fines and suspension from the University.
Bond University utilises Originality Reporting software to inform academic integrity.Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, as per the Assessment Policy.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
If you have a disability, illness, injury or health condition that impacts your capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks, it is important you let us know your special requirements, early in the semester. Students will need to make an application for support and submit it with recent, comprehensive documentation at an appointment with a Disability Officer. Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Office at the earliest possible time, to meet staff and learn about the services available to meet your specific needs. Please note that late notification or failure to disclose your disability can be to your disadvantage as the University cannot guarantee support under such circumstances.
Additional subject information
Subject curriculum
-
Week 1 - Introduction
A 21st Century Agenda for the Indo-Pacific.
-
Week 2 - Australian Foreign Policy
Australia's International Relations: Shifting Trends in Foreign Policy.
-
Week 3 - Indonesia and the region
The Transformation of Indonesia and its Regional Significance.
-
Week 3 - Great Power Relations
The Competition for Influence.
-
Week 5 - Australian Defence Policy
Australian Defence Policy: From National Defence to Regional Security.
-
Week 6 - ASEAN Organizations
ASEAN Plus: The Drivers of Open Regionalism.
-
Week 7 - Energy and Environment
Asia-Pacific Transitions: Environmental, Economic and Energy Challenges.
-
Week 8 - South Asia
South Asia and the Indian Ocean: Cooperation or Institutionalized Conflict?
-
Week 9 - The South Pacific
The Not-So-Peaceful South Pacific.
-
Week 10 - China's Multi-Track Engagement
China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Contested Governance.
-
Week 11 - New Institutions and Processes
Regional Diversity, Globalization and Competing Regionalisms.
-
Week 12 - Conclusion: Regional Policy Prospects
Future-Directed Policies for the Asia-Pacific Region.