General Information
In this subject, students explore the various creative approaches to screen media through the screening and analysis of Hollywood, independent, international and alternative film, screen and digital content. Students examine the broad range of screen aesthetics by investigating the characteristics of screen storytelling, style, and major genres, and how these characteristics are shaped by social, industrial, and technological changes.
-
Details
Academic unit: Faculty of Society & Design Subject code: FITV11-130 Subject title: Screen Style and Storytelling Subject level: Undergraduate Semester/Year: January 2022 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Standard Workload items: - Lecture: x12 (Total hours: 24) - Weekly Lecture
- Tutorial: x12 (Total hours: 12) - Weekly Tutorial
- AV Screening: x12 (Total hours: 36) - AV Screening
- Personal Study Hours: x12 (Total hours: 48) - Recommended Study Hours
Attendance and learning activities: -
Resources
Prescribed resources: Books
- David Bordwell & Kristin Thompson (2019). Film Art: An Introduction. 12th, New York McGraw-Hill
iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Academic unit: | Faculty of Society & Design |
---|---|
Subject code: | FITV11-130 |
Subject title: | Screen Style and Storytelling |
Subject level: | Undergraduate |
Semester/Year: | January 2022 |
Credit points: | 10.000 |
Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
---|---|
Delivery mode: | Standard |
Workload items: |
|
Attendance and learning activities: |
Prescribed resources: | Books
|
---|---|
iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
Requisites: |
Nil |
---|---|
Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge.
|
Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Identify and describe screen aesthetics and storytelling across various formats.
- Define and apply key concepts and terms as they function within screen aesthetics.
- Critically examine the aesthetics of screen content.
- Curate a collection of critical analyses of screen content.
- Develop a screen studies research plan.
- Present a screen studies research project in written form.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Research Paper Research Project Part A. 15% Week 7 3,5 Research Paper Research Project Part B. 15% Week 10 3,6 Journal Film Dossier 200-250 word critical analyses of 10 Screenings, with a contextual introduction. 40% Week 13 1,3,4 *Online Quiz Open-book quizzes (weeks 4, 8, 12) 30% Progressive 1,2 - * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Research Paper | Research Project Part A. | 15% | Week 7 | 3,5 |
Research Paper | Research Project Part B. | 15% | Week 10 | 3,6 |
Journal | Film Dossier 200-250 word critical analyses of 10 Screenings, with a contextual introduction. | 40% | Week 13 | 1,3,4 |
*Online Quiz | Open-book quizzes (weeks 4, 8, 12) | 30% | Progressive | 1,2 |
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
---|---|---|
Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A student who has not established a basis for an extension in compliance with University and Faculty policy either by 1) not applying before the assessment due date or 2) by having an application rejected due to failure to show a justifiable cause for an extension, will receive a penalty on assessment submitted after its due date. The penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment for every day late, with the first day counted after the required submission time has passed. No assessment will be accepted for consideration seven calendar days after the due date. Where a student has been granted an extension, the late penalty starts from the new due date and time set out in the extension.
Academic Integrity
University’s Academic Integrity Policy defines plagiarism as the act of misrepresenting as one’s own original work: another’s ideas, interpretations, words, or creative works; and/or one’s own previous ideas, interpretations, words, or creative work without acknowledging that it was used previously (i.e., self-plagiarism). The University considers the act of plagiarising to be a breach of the Student Conduct Code and, therefore, subject to the Discipline Regulations which provide for a range of penalties including the reduction of marks or grades, fines and suspension from the University.
Bond University utilises Originality Reporting software to inform academic integrity.Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, as per the Assessment Policy.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
If you have a disability, illness, injury or health condition that impacts your capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks, it is important you let us know your special requirements, early in the semester. Students will need to make an application for support and submit it with recent, comprehensive documentation at an appointment with a Disability Officer. Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Office at the earliest possible time, to meet staff and learn about the services available to meet your specific needs. Please note that late notification or failure to disclose your disability can be to your disadvantage as the University cannot guarantee support under such circumstances.
Additional subject information
Subject curriculum
-
Screen aesthetics
This subject investigates a range of questions surrounding the development and evolution of screen aesthetics to identify key characteristics of form, storytelling, style and genre.
SLOs included
- Identify and describe screen aesthetics and storytelling across various formats.
- Define and apply key concepts and terms as they function within screen aesthetics.
- Curate a collection of critical analyses of screen content.
- Develop a screen studies research plan.
- Present a screen studies research project in written form.
-
Artistic meaning
Students examine how does artistic form shape meaning?
SLOs included
- Identify and describe screen aesthetics and storytelling across various formats.
- Define and apply key concepts and terms as they function within screen aesthetics.
- Critically examine the aesthetics of screen content.
-
Modes of Storytelling
Students examine how modes of storytelling differ among screen platforms such as traditional film, film franchises, TV series, streaming series and transmedia?
SLOs included
- Identify and describe screen aesthetics and storytelling across various formats.
- Define and apply key concepts and terms as they function within screen aesthetics.
- Critically examine the aesthetics of screen content.
-
Directorial style
Students explore the key techniques of staging, cinematography, editing and sound that combine to create the style of an individual work, or of a particular director?
SLOs included
- Identify and describe screen aesthetics and storytelling across various formats.
- Define and apply key concepts and terms as they function within screen aesthetics.
- Critically examine the aesthetics of screen content.
-
Changing genres
Students examine how typical genres have changed and adapted to screen platforms and audience expectation?
SLOs included
- Identify and describe screen aesthetics and storytelling across various formats.
- Define and apply key concepts and terms as they function within screen aesthetics.
- Critically examine the aesthetics of screen content.
-
Film Screening
La La Land (Chazelle, 2016)
-
Film screening
The Wizard of Oz (Fleming, 1939)
-
Film screening
Citizen Kane (Welles, 1941)
-
Film screening
Memento (Nolan, 2000)
-
Film screening
Moonrise Kingdom (Anderson, 2012)
-
Film screening
Raging Bull (Scorsese, 1980)
-
Film screening
Lost in Translation (S. Coppola, 2003)
-
Film screening
Breathless (Godard, 1960)
-
Film screening
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (Gondry, 2004)
-
Film screening
The Shape of Water (Del Toro, 2017)
-
Film screening
Mulholland Dr. (Lynch, 2001)
-
Film screening
The Thin Blue Line (Morris, 1988)