General Information
Professional Portfolio is a 20 week, 45 credit point subject available to Masters (Professional) students in the Bond Business School. This subject is strongly experientially oriented and encourages students to develop their professional skills in a real world environment. The subject will ensure that students combine selfanalysis and reflective learning skills with professional methodologies, so as to expand analytic and strategic thinking capabilities. It will provide practical experience for students to develop their skills in a profession relevant to their Masters specialisation.
All students will complete a 2,000 word scoping document, and either undertake a work placement in Australia for 210 hours (which includes an employer’s report) and reflective journal (up to 5,000 words) OR complete a collaborative research project totalling up to 15,000 words. All students will submit a final professional portfolio collection of documents, highlighting their practical and theoretical expertise in their profession of choice. The Professional Portfolio subject cannot be commenced until the student has successfully completed all 12 subjects of the Masters component of the degree.
-
Details
Academic unit: Bond Business School Subject code: BUSN71-701 Subject title: Professional Portfolio Subject level: Postgraduate Semester/Year: May 2017 Credit points: 45.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Standard Workload items: - Research Activity: x12 (Total hours: 120) - Self-directed research activity
- Lecture: x12 (Total hours: 36) - Weekly Lecture
- Prescribed Consultation: x10 (Total hours: 10) - Consultation
Attendance and learning activities: The classes are intentionally conducted as workshop sessions in which I encourage (and have an expectation of) a high level of interaction and discussion. Students are expected to provide written justification for any absence, eg. Doctor's certificate. -
Resources
Prescribed resources: Books
- Jim Bright,Karen Bright (2005). Land that Job in Australia. n/a, Tribus Lingua 207
iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Academic unit: | Bond Business School |
---|---|
Subject code: | BUSN71-701 |
Subject title: | Professional Portfolio |
Subject level: | Postgraduate |
Semester/Year: | May 2017 |
Credit points: | 45.000 |
Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
---|---|
Delivery mode: | Standard |
Workload items: |
|
Attendance and learning activities: | The classes are intentionally conducted as workshop sessions in which I encourage (and have an expectation of) a high level of interaction and discussion. Students are expected to provide written justification for any absence, eg. Doctor's certificate. |
Prescribed resources: | Books
|
---|---|
iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
Requisites: |
Nil |
---|---|
Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge. Students must have successfully completed all 12 Masters subjects. This subject cannot be taken in conjunction with any other subject and must be taken in the final semester of a Master (Professional) program. |
Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Integrate classroom learning with professional experience
- Examine the structure and functions of a company in their chosen profession
- Gain practical experience and develop professional skills that enhance job opportunities
- Discover professional strengths and weaknesses, evaluate career opportunities and develop a sense of greater professional responsibility
- Further develop drafting and writing skills
- Further develop communication and interpersonal skills
- Further develop research proficiency.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Essay Reflective Essay 20.00% Week 6 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Professionalism Professional Portfolio/Reflective Diary 60.00% Progressive 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Written Report Written Report 20.00% In Consultation 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 - * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Essay | Reflective Essay | 20.00% | Week 6 | 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 |
Professionalism | Professional Portfolio/Reflective Diary | 60.00% | Progressive | 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 |
Written Report | Written Report | 20.00% | In Consultation | 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 |
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
---|---|---|
Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Academic Integrity
University’s Academic Integrity Policy defines plagiarism as the act of misrepresenting as one’s own original work: another’s ideas, interpretations, words, or creative works; and/or one’s own previous ideas, interpretations, words, or creative work without acknowledging that it was used previously (i.e., self-plagiarism). The University considers the act of plagiarising to be a breach of the Student Conduct Code and, therefore, subject to the Discipline Regulations which provide for a range of penalties including the reduction of marks or grades, fines and suspension from the University.
Bond University utilises Originality Reporting software to inform academic integrity.Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, as per the Assessment Policy.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
If you have a disability, illness, injury or health condition that impacts your capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks, it is important you let us know your special requirements, early in the semester. Students will need to make an application for support and submit it with recent, comprehensive documentation at an appointment with a Disability Officer. Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Office at the earliest possible time, to meet staff and learn about the services available to meet your specific needs. Please note that late notification or failure to disclose your disability can be to your disadvantage as the University cannot guarantee support under such circumstances.
Additional subject information
Subject curriculum
-
Week 1-12 Review
Fortnightly meeting with the University instructor.
-
Introduction to Course
Readings: Networking skills - go to https:://careerhub.bond.edu.au/login and follow instructions. Read networking and schmoozing articles.
-
Australian Overview
Readings : Australian Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, About Australia A Snapshot + Ten Good Reasons - A Summary, Austrade + Australia, CIA - The World Factbook + Ten Good Reasons - A summary, retrieved 21 January, 2009.
-
From a convict nation through the 1900's
Readings: Knightley - chapters 1-3.
-
Population & immigration and business impacts
Readings: Knightley - chapters 4-6, Rickard, J., Australia A Cultural History, Chapter 9: Diversity, Addison Wesley Longman, New York, 1999, pp 219-243.
-
Social context
Readings: Knightley - chapters 7-9 + chapter: Thought and Religion.
-
Social myths and realities
Readings: Knightley - chapters 10-12 + Davie. M., Anglo- Australian Attitudes, Chapter 9: Australian Accent, Secker & Warburg, London, 2000, pp 183-200 + Gare, D. & Ritters, D., Making Australian History, Perspectives on the Past Since 1788, Anzac by Bill.
-
Cultural differences presentations
Readings: Knightley - chapters 13 onwards + chapter: Coping in a new country + Sainsbury, M., Vinicultural Revolution, The Weekend Australian Magazine, 3-4 July, 2010 + Geert Hoftstede, Cultural Dimensions.
-
Employability skills
Readings: handouts to be provided.
-
Interview Skills
Readings: handouts to be provided.
-
Employment and the workforce
N/A
-
Workplace expectations
Readings: chapter - Coping in a new country.
-
Political and business environment
Readings: Terrill, R., The Australians: Policitical ways at home and abroad, Doubleday, Sydney 2000 pp 281 - 300.
-
LinkedIn profile development
Readings: Nicholas, P., Winning the battle for talent, The Australian, 30-31 October, 2010.
-
Final Project Preparation
Preparation during weeks 14 - 16.
-
Presentations and Assessment Centre Activity
Iconic Australian company presentation and Assessment Centre Activity.
-
Mock Interviews
Individual appointment times will be organised with you.
-
Presentations
Individual appointment times will be organised with you.
-
Business networking etiquette
Sainsbury, M., Vinicultural Revolution, The Weekend Australian Magazine, 3-4 July, 2010.