General Information
This research seminar series is aimed at assisting students in the planning and design phases of their thesis. Students present their research ideas to other students in an informal setting, and receive feedback on their proposed methodology and the implementation of the study. In the second part of the subject, students are introduced to the APS Code of Ethics and the complimentary Ethical Guidelines. Each week students are presented with a series of ethically problematic scenarios to which they discuss possible solutions and a brief plan of action. Attendance at seminars is compulsory.
-
Details
Academic unit: Faculty of Society & Design Subject code: PSYC71-401 Subject title: Honours Thesis 1: Research Seminar and Ethics Subject level: Honours Semester/Year: September 2019 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Standard Workload items: - Seminar: x12 (Total hours: 24) - Weekly Seminar
- Personal Study Hours: x12 (Total hours: 96) - Recommended Study Hours
Attendance and learning activities: -
Resources
Prescribed resources: Others
- Australian Psychological Society (2007). APS Code of Ethics. Melbourne Australian Psychological Society
iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
| Academic unit: | Faculty of Society & Design |
|---|---|
| Subject code: | PSYC71-401 |
| Subject title: | Honours Thesis 1: Research Seminar and Ethics |
| Subject level: | Honours |
| Semester/Year: | September 2019 |
| Credit points: | 10.000 |
| Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
|---|---|
| Delivery mode: | Standard |
| Workload items: |
|
| Attendance and learning activities: |
| Prescribed resources: | Others
|
|---|---|
| iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
| Requisites: |
Nil |
|---|---|
| Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge.
|
| Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Design a psychological study: frame research questions; undertake literature searches; critique theoretical and empirical studies; formulate hypotheses; operationalise variables; choose an appropriate methodology.
- Respect and use critical and creative thinking, sceptical enquiry, and the scientific approach to solve problems related to behaviour and mental processes.
- Evaluate psychologists' behaviour in psychological research and other professional contexts in relation to the APS Code of Ethics and the complimentary Ethical Guidelines.
- Communicate effectively in a variety of formats and in a variety of contexts.
- Understand and apply psychological principles to personal, social and organisational issues.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Thesis All of the items below are required to be emailed on the due date and time to the coordinator Dr Aileen Pidgeon [email protected] Week 12 Draft Literature Review and Method Section of your thesis Week 12 Evidence of BUHREC clearance Week 12 Evidence of Enrolment in Thesis 2 Subject C Week 12 1,2,3,4,5 Thesis All of the items below are required to be emailed on the due date and time to the coordinator Dr Aileen Pidgeon [email protected] Week 2 Friday 4 pm Signed Supervisor Agreement Week 5 Friday 4 pm Evidence of BUHREC Application Submitted - Friday 4pm Week 8 Friday 4 pm Draft of research question/s, aim/s and hypothesis/es for your thesis C Progressive 1,2,4 - * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
| Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thesis | All of the items below are required to be emailed on the due date and time to the coordinator Dr Aileen Pidgeon [email protected] Week 12 Draft Literature Review and Method Section of your thesis Week 12 Evidence of BUHREC clearance Week 12 Evidence of Enrolment in Thesis 2 Subject | C | Week 12 | 1,2,3,4,5 |
| Thesis | All of the items below are required to be emailed on the due date and time to the coordinator Dr Aileen Pidgeon [email protected] Week 2 Friday 4 pm Signed Supervisor Agreement Week 5 Friday 4 pm Evidence of BUHREC Application Submitted - Friday 4pm Week 8 Friday 4 pm Draft of research question/s, aim/s and hypothesis/es for your thesis | C | Progressive | 1,2,4 |
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
| High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
|---|---|---|
| Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
| Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
| Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
| Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Academic Integrity
University’s Academic Integrity Policy defines plagiarism as the act of misrepresenting as one’s own original work: another’s ideas, interpretations, words, or creative works; and/or one’s own previous ideas, interpretations, words, or creative work without acknowledging that it was used previously (i.e., self-plagiarism). The University considers the act of plagiarising to be a breach of the Student Conduct Code and, therefore, subject to the Discipline Regulations which provide for a range of penalties including the reduction of marks or grades, fines and suspension from the University.
Bond University utilises Originality Reporting software to inform academic integrity.Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, as per the Assessment Policy.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
If you have a disability, illness, injury or health condition that impacts your capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks, it is important you let us know your special requirements, early in the semester. Students will need to make an application for support and submit it with recent, comprehensive documentation at an appointment with a Disability Officer. Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Office at the earliest possible time, to meet staff and learn about the services available to meet your specific needs. Please note that late notification or failure to disclose your disability can be to your disadvantage as the University cannot guarantee support under such circumstances.
Additional subject information
Subject curriculum
-
Lecture 1 - Welcome and Orientation to Thesis 1
Learning objectives and expectations - Gain an understanding of the process of nominating a thesis supervisor; Thesis 1 tasks; choosing a topic; Thesis 1 requirements; poster session; submission of thesis; resources available.
-
Lecture 2 - Research Seminar 1
Learning objectives and expectations - Gain an understanding of issues relevant to conducting a psychological study at the 4th year level. Signed Supervision Agreement to be handed in at Lecture 2.
-
Lecture 3 - BUHREC Application Process
Learning objectives and expectations - Gain an understanding of the BUHREC application process and the role of the Ethics Committee in research.
-
Lecture 4 - Library Resources
Learning objectives and expectations of lecture - Gain an understanding of resources available in the library and how to undertake literature searches.
-
Lecture 5 - Research Seminar 2
Learning objectives and expectations - Gain an understanding of how to frame research questions; formulate aims and hypotheses. Evidence of BUHREC Application Submitted to be handed in at Lecture 5.
-
Lecture 6 - Research Seminar 3
Learning objectives and expectations - Gain an understanding of how to structure the introduction. Draft of research question/s, aim/s and hypothesis/es for your thesis to be handed in at Week 6 lecture.
-
Lecture 7 - Research Seminar 4
Learning objectives and expectations of lecture - Increase understanding of how to write up the method; write academically and APA formatting.
-
Lecture 8 - Ethics Seminar 1
Learning objectives and expectations - Further knowledge and understanding of applied ethics in psychology, including ethical principles. Draft of first two pages of introduction of your thesis to be handed in at Week 8 lecture.
-
Lecture 9 - Ethics Seminar 2
Learning objectives and expectations - Further knowledge and understanding of the application of the APS Code of Ethics, Guidelines, and Client Charter.
-
Lecture 10 - Ethics Seminar 3
Learning objectives and expectations - Further knowledge and understanding of the application of ethical decision making models.
-
Lecture 11 - Ethics Seminar 4
Learning objectives and expectations - Further knowledge and understanding of the application of the APS Code of Ethics, ethical principles, and decision making models.
-
Lecture 12 - Ethics Seminar 5
Learning objectives and expectations - Further knowledge and understanding of the application of the APS Code of Ethics, ethical principles, and decision making models. Draft of Literature Review and Method Section for your thesis to be handed in at Week 12 lecture; Evidence of BUHREC Clearance and Enrolment in Thesis 2 to be handed in at Lecture 12.