General Information
What timeless questions have captivated philosophers for centuries? How can a philosophical pursuit of knowledge and understanding shape our own perspectives on issues such as the existence of God, the nature of reality, and the relation between mind and body? This subject will help find your own answers to these questions. The study of philosophy opens your mind to questions that don’t have easy answers but can’t be dismissed either. The subject will give you the tools to do philosophy actively and personally, enhancing and deepening your academic journey.
-
Details
Academic unit: Faculty of Society & Design Subject code: PHIL11-101 Subject title: Introduction to Philosophy Subject level: Undergraduate Semester/Year: September 2024 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Standard Workload items: - Forum: x12 (Total hours: 24) - Weekly Forum
- Tutorial: x12 (Total hours: 12) - Weekly Tutorial
- Personal Study Hours: x12 (Total hours: 84) - Recommended Study Hours
Attendance and learning activities: As successful completion of this subject is heavily dependent on participation during all scheduled sessions, attendance will be monitored. Most sessions build on the content of the previous one. It is difficult for a student to recover the information if a session is missed. It is the responsibility of the student to view the recordings of the weekly live sessions in order to catch up on any content missed and to complete set work outside class. In addition to synchronous sessions, students should plan to spend a minimum of 84 hours undertaking preparation/out of class work/personal study for this subject. This is intended as a general guide only for workload planning and more time may be required depending on different factors such as the familiarity of the content. -
Resources
Prescribed resources: No Prescribed resources.
After enrolment, students can check the Books and Tools area in iLearn for the full Resource List.iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications.
Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student.
To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
| Academic unit: | Faculty of Society & Design |
|---|---|
| Subject code: | PHIL11-101 |
| Subject title: | Introduction to Philosophy |
| Subject level: | Undergraduate |
| Semester/Year: | September 2024 |
| Credit points: | 10.000 |
| Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
|---|---|
| Delivery mode: | Standard |
| Workload items: |
|
| Attendance and learning activities: | As successful completion of this subject is heavily dependent on participation during all scheduled sessions, attendance will be monitored. Most sessions build on the content of the previous one. It is difficult for a student to recover the information if a session is missed. It is the responsibility of the student to view the recordings of the weekly live sessions in order to catch up on any content missed and to complete set work outside class. In addition to synchronous sessions, students should plan to spend a minimum of 84 hours undertaking preparation/out of class work/personal study for this subject. This is intended as a general guide only for workload planning and more time may be required depending on different factors such as the familiarity of the content. |
| Prescribed resources: | No Prescribed resources. After enrolment, students can check the Books and Tools area in iLearn for the full Resource List. |
|---|---|
| iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
| Requisites: |
Nil |
|---|---|
| Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge.
|
| Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
- Independently and in teams, generate and transmit solutions to unpredictable and sometimes complex problems related to major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Apply philosophical knowledge to professional work and/or further learning, demonstrating well-developed judgement and responsibility.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Assignment Written debate between contrasting philosophical positions. 40.00% Week 7 1,2,3 Assignment Critical investigation of a major philosophical question (1500 words). 50.00% Week 12 1,2,3,4 Discussion Philosophical Group Discussion 10.00% Weekly 3 - * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
| Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assignment | Written debate between contrasting philosophical positions. | 40.00% | Week 7 | 1,2,3 |
| Assignment | Critical investigation of a major philosophical question (1500 words). | 50.00% | Week 12 | 1,2,3,4 |
| Discussion | Philosophical Group Discussion | 10.00% | Weekly | 3 |
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
| High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
|---|---|---|
| Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
| Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
| Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
| Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A student who has not established a basis for an extension in compliance with University and Faculty policy either by 1) not applying before the assessment due date or 2) by having an application rejected due to failure to show a justifiable cause for an extension, will receive a penalty on assessment submitted after its due date. The penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment for every day late, with the first day counted after the required submission time has passed. No assessment will be accepted for consideration seven calendar days after the due date. Where a student has been granted an extension, the late penalty starts from the new due date and time set out in the extension.
Academic Integrity
Bond University‘s Student Code of Conduct Policy , Student Charter, Academic Integrity Policy and our Graduate Attributes guide expectations regarding student behaviour, their rights and responsibilities. Information on these topics can be found on our Academic Integrity webpage recognising that academic integrity involves demonstrating the principles of integrity (honesty, fairness, trust, professionalism, courage, responsibility, and respect) in words and actions across all aspects of academic endeavour.
Staff are required to report suspected misconduct. This includes all types of plagiarism, cheating, collusion, fabrication or falsification of data/content or other misconduct relating to assessment such as the falsification of medical certificates for assessment extensions. The longer term personal, social and financial consequences of misconduct can be severe, so please ask for help if you are unsure.
If your work is subject to an inquiry, you will be given an opportunity to respond and appropriate support will be provided. Academic work under inquiry will not be marked until the process has concluded. Penalties for misconduct include a warning, reduced grade, a requirement to repeat the assessment, suspension or expulsion from the University.
Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students according to the requirements of the Assessment Procedure Schedule A - Assessment Communication Procedure.
Whilst in most cases feedback should be provided within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, the Procedure should be checked if the assessment is linked to others or if the subject is a non-standard (e.g., intensive) subject.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
Support is available to students where a physical, mental or neurological condition exists that would impact the student’s capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks. For effective support, special requirement needs should be arranged with the University in advance of or at the start of each semester, or, for acute conditions, as soon as practicable after the condition arises. Reasonable adjustments are not guaranteed where applications are submitted late in the semester (for example, when lodged just prior to critical assessment and examination dates).
As outlined in the Accessibility and Inclusion Policy, to qualify for support, students must meet certain criteria. Students are also required to meet with the Accessibility and Inclusion Advisor who will ensure that reasonable adjustments are afforded to qualifying students.
For more information and to apply online, visit BondAbility.
Additional subject information
Subject curriculum
-
What is Philosophy?
The nature and value of philosophical inquiry.
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
-
The Meaning of Life
Let's start with the big one. What does it mean to say that life has a meaning? What has this to do with the fact that we will all dies someday? (Maybe nothing. We'll see.)
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
- Independently and in teams, generate and transmit solutions to unpredictable and sometimes complex problems related to major philosophical traditions of the West.
-
Descartes and the Search for Certainty
A central concern of philosophers has been to search out secure foundations for our knowledge of the world. This is one of the key tasks of the branch of philosophy called ‘epistemology’. Descartes provides our guide to the task.
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
-
Mind and Body
The relation between mind and body – sometimes known as the mind-body problem – is one of the deepest and most perplexing of philosophical topics. It is yet to be fully resolved. In this lecture, we examine the most famous and influential discussion of the problem in modern philosophy – that of Descartes.
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
- Independently and in teams, generate and transmit solutions to unpredictable and sometimes complex problems related to major philosophical traditions of the West.
-
A World of Ideas
Descartes left us with a problem: how can we be certain of, or even justified in, our beliefs about the real world: the world existing independently of our experience of it. This week we examine another attempt to deal with the problem: that of the 18th century Irish philosopher George Berkeley (1685 – 1753). He develops a form of idealism.
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
- Independently and in teams, generate and transmit solutions to unpredictable and sometimes complex problems related to major philosophical traditions of the West.
-
Minds and Machines
We examine the alternatives to Descartes' theory of the mind and body. There is a bunch of possibilities: epiphenomenalism, dual-aspect theory, idealism, behaviourism, materialism, computationalism. (Basically, a lot of isms.) Which one is the most plausible alternative to Descartes?
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
- Independently and in teams, generate and transmit solutions to unpredictable and sometimes complex problems related to major philosophical traditions of the West.
-
Free Will
We consider the metaphysical issue of free will. The main questions here are (1) What is free will? (2) Do human agents have free will? (3) Is free will necessary for moral agency? The answers to each of these questions is controversial.
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
- Independently and in teams, generate and transmit solutions to unpredictable and sometimes complex problems related to major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Apply philosophical knowledge to professional work and/or further learning, demonstrating well-developed judgement and responsibility.
-
Week 8: Personal Identity
Is survival after death possible? Survival requires identity in a strict sense. So what is personal identity? Is it even possible that whatever surivives the death of my body (my soul? my ghost?) is really me? How much could I change and still be me?
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
- Independently and in teams, generate and transmit solutions to unpredictable and sometimes complex problems related to major philosophical traditions of the West.
-
Arguments for the existence of God
We examine two of the most philosophically sophisticated arguments for God: the ontological argument and the cosmological argument.
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
- Independently and in teams, generate and transmit solutions to unpredictable and sometimes complex problems related to major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Apply philosophical knowledge to professional work and/or further learning, demonstrating well-developed judgement and responsibility.
-
God and World: Brilliant Design or Mess-up?
The most popular argument for God is the design argument. The most popular argument against God is the argument from evil. They share a lot. We investigate them together.
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
- Independently and in teams, generate and transmit solutions to unpredictable and sometimes complex problems related to major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Apply philosophical knowledge to professional work and/or further learning, demonstrating well-developed judgement and responsibility.
-
Beyond Good and Evil
What (if anything) makes it right to do one thing rather than another? This week we discuss the metaphysics of morality.
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
- Independently and in teams, generate and transmit solutions to unpredictable and sometimes complex problems related to major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Apply philosophical knowledge to professional work and/or further learning, demonstrating well-developed judgement and responsibility.
-
Summing it up
We return to the question of philosophy. What is it? What is it's value? Now that we have done some philosophy, we can start to answer this question.
SLOs included
- Identify, analyse, evaluate and communicate broad and coherent knowledge of major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Think philosophically about science, history, and personal experience.
- Independently and in teams, generate and transmit solutions to unpredictable and sometimes complex problems related to major philosophical traditions of the West.
- Apply philosophical knowledge to professional work and/or further learning, demonstrating well-developed judgement and responsibility.