General Information
The primary intention of this subject is for participants to explore ‘health’, from the evolution of global, public and population health through to planetary health. One definition of planetary health is the health of human civilisation and the state of the natural systems on which it depends. Human health and well-being are thus intrinsically connected to the environment. In this subject, participants will reflect on the impact that the changing environment has on human health and well-being in different populations from a range of perspectives: Ethical, equity, advocacy, social and environmental or ecological justice. In tracing the ‘evolution’ of population health to planetary health, we will explore how innovations, such as vaccinations, have led to improved health outcomes. We will also examine how the current threats to human health, such as climate change, water shortages, antibiotic resistance and food insecurity have the potential to wipe out the health gains of the past 50 years. As the world population continues to increase, we will explore the policies and strategies required to address current and future challenges to human health and well-being.
-
Details
Academic unit: Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine Subject code: HPER71-116 Subject title: Planetary Health Subject level: Postgraduate Semester/Year: September 2024 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Mixed (Online) Workload items: - Directed Online Activity: x12 (Total hours: 84) - Weekly self-paced content engagement
- Directed Online Activity: x10 (Total hours: 10) - Discussion board and formative assessment questions.
- Workshop: x1 (Total hours: 8) - Intensive workshop
- Tutorial: x3 (Total hours: 3) - General catch up and information sessions relating to assessment
- Personal Study Hours: x12 (Total hours: 15) - Recommended study hours
Attendance and learning activities: Students will be required to attend a one-day workshop. -
Resources
Prescribed resources: No Prescribed resources.
After enrolment, students can check the Books and Tools area in iLearn for the full Resource List.iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications.
Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student.
To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
| Academic unit: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine |
|---|---|
| Subject code: | HPER71-116 |
| Subject title: | Planetary Health |
| Subject level: | Postgraduate |
| Semester/Year: | September 2024 |
| Credit points: | 10.000 |
| Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
|---|---|
| Delivery mode: | Mixed (Online) |
| Workload items: |
|
| Attendance and learning activities: | Students will be required to attend a one-day workshop. |
| Prescribed resources: | No Prescribed resources. After enrolment, students can check the Books and Tools area in iLearn for the full Resource List. |
|---|---|
| iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
| Requisites: |
Nil |
|---|---|
| Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge.
|
| Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Discuss the concept of health and well-being in a complex, changing world.
- Explain what is meant by 'planetary health'.
- Compare historical and current trends in global disease patterns to explain terms such as demographic transition, epidemiological transition and ecological transition.
- Discuss the environment as a determinant of health and explain why the world is in 'ecological transition', including the implications for future generations.
- Explain what is meant by (environmental) sustainability, such as the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and sustainable healthcare.
- Summarise the role of ethics, justice, advocacy and activism in ensuring sustainable health and well-being.
- Formulate strategies and policies to tackle current and future threats to health and well-being both locally and globally.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Exercise Critical reflection - 1500-1800 words 20.00% Week 4 1,2,3,4 Literature Review Literature Review - 3500 words +/-10% 40.00% Week 10 1,2,3,4,5 Oral Pitch Video Presentation - 15-20 mins 40.00% Week 12 5,6,7 - * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Pass requirement
Expectation to ensure engagement with weekly content is participation in the discussion forum and completion of the formative assessment questions.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
| Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise | Critical reflection - 1500-1800 words | 20.00% | Week 4 | 1,2,3,4 |
| Literature Review | Literature Review - 3500 words +/-10% | 40.00% | Week 10 | 1,2,3,4,5 |
| Oral Pitch | Video Presentation - 15-20 mins | 40.00% | Week 12 | 5,6,7 |
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Pass requirement
Expectation to ensure engagement with weekly content is participation in the discussion forum and completion of the formative assessment questions.
Assessment criteria
| High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
|---|---|---|
| Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
| Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
| Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
| Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Academic Integrity
Bond University‘s Student Code of Conduct Policy , Student Charter, Academic Integrity Policy and our Graduate Attributes guide expectations regarding student behaviour, their rights and responsibilities. Information on these topics can be found on our Academic Integrity webpage recognising that academic integrity involves demonstrating the principles of integrity (honesty, fairness, trust, professionalism, courage, responsibility, and respect) in words and actions across all aspects of academic endeavour.
Staff are required to report suspected misconduct. This includes all types of plagiarism, cheating, collusion, fabrication or falsification of data/content or other misconduct relating to assessment such as the falsification of medical certificates for assessment extensions. The longer term personal, social and financial consequences of misconduct can be severe, so please ask for help if you are unsure.
If your work is subject to an inquiry, you will be given an opportunity to respond and appropriate support will be provided. Academic work under inquiry will not be marked until the process has concluded. Penalties for misconduct include a warning, reduced grade, a requirement to repeat the assessment, suspension or expulsion from the University.
Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students according to the requirements of the Assessment Procedure Schedule A - Assessment Communication Procedure.
Whilst in most cases feedback should be provided within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, the Procedure should be checked if the assessment is linked to others or if the subject is a non-standard (e.g., intensive) subject.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
Support is available to students where a physical, mental or neurological condition exists that would impact the student’s capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks. For effective support, special requirement needs should be arranged with the University in advance of or at the start of each semester, or, for acute conditions, as soon as practicable after the condition arises. Reasonable adjustments are not guaranteed where applications are submitted late in the semester (for example, when lodged just prior to critical assessment and examination dates).
As outlined in the Accessibility and Inclusion Policy, to qualify for support, students must meet certain criteria. Students are also required to meet with the Accessibility and Inclusion Advisor who will ensure that reasonable adjustments are afforded to qualifying students.
For more information and to apply online, visit BondAbility.
Additional subject information
Subject curriculum
-
Health and well-being as a concept, including ethics, justice and advocacy
Health and well-being will be explored from different perspectives. Justice would include ecological, climate and intergenerational.
-
International and local organisations involved in health and well-being
The best example is the WHO. A local body would be the Australian Medical Association.
-
Definitions, principles and models underpinning public health, global health and planetary health
Human development transitions,from demographic, epidemiological and ecological, will be explored.
-
Historical, current and future threats to health and well-being
Epidemiology, disease profiles, environmental factors, vulnerability.
-
Measures of health, quality of life and disease burden e.g. YLL, YLD, SDI, etc.
Determinants of health, e.g. ecological and social plus how health and well-being is measured, such as Global Burden of Diseases Study.
-
Sustainability as a broad concept i.e. environment; healthcare; healthcare systems.
Environmental sustainability and a consideration of weak and strong sustainability models. Also discussed will be the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. The footprint of healthcare will be explored.
-
Strategies to improve quality of life and address inequality through sustainable development
Using, e.g. the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, adaptation and mitigation strategies will be discussed.