General Information
One of the essential competencies for effective leadership is the ability to effectively initiate, implement and sustain desired change. Although organisations continue to expend substantial time and resources on change initiatives, the majority of such efforts do not achieve their intended outcomes. In this subject, you will explore the underlying reasons for these failures to examine the fundamental nature of change and the challenges that change agents at different organisational levels face as they plan and execute change. You will also have the opportunity to reflect on your personal development over the past year and to consider your personal goals for continued improvement.
-
Details
Academic unit: Bond Business School Subject code: EXEC71-031 Subject title: Strategic People Management and Organisational Change Subject level: Postgraduate Semester/Year: May 2019 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Intensive Workload items: - Seminar: x8 (Total hours: 36) - Seminars 1 to 4 (4hr per session Intensive Mode)
- Personal Study Hours: x12 (Total hours: 66) - Recommended study time & reviewing materials
Attendance and learning activities: Attendance at all scheduled sessions is expected. Students are expected to notify the instructor of any absences with as much advance notice as possible. -
Resources
Prescribed resources: Journals
- Caldwell, R. (2003). Change leaders and change managers: different or complementary?. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 285-293
- Caldwell, R. (2003). Models of change agency: a fourfold classification.. British Journal of Management 131-142.
- Beer, M., & Spector (1993). Organizational diagnosis: Its role in organizational learning.. Journal of Counseling & Development 642-650.
- Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. A., & Spector, B. (1990). Why change programs don’t produce change.
- Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., & Caldwell, S. D. (2007). Beyond change management: A multilevel investigation of contextual and personal influences on employees' commitment to change. Journal of Applied Psychology 942
- Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A., & Rubin, R. S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior 733-753
- Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail.
- Oreg, S., & Berson, Y. (2011). LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEES’REACTIONS TO CHANGE: THE ROLE OF LEADERS’PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP STYLE. Personnel psychology 627- 659
- Neuman, G. A., Edwards, J. E., & Raju, N. S. (1989). Organizational development interventions: A metaanalysis of their effects on satisfaction and other attitudes. Personnel Psychology 461-489
- Nicholas, J. M. (1979). Evaluation research in organizational change interventions: Considerations and some suggestions.. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 23-40
- Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of management 110-135.
- Rafferty, A. E., & Jimmieson, N. L. (2017). Subjective Perceptions of Organizational Change and Employee Resistance to Change: Direct and Mediated Relationships with Employee Wellbeing. British Journal of Management 248-264.
- Clayton M Christensen and Michael Overdorf (2000). “Meeting the challenge of disruptive change”. Harvard Business Review
- Amis, J., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2004). The pace, sequence, and linearity of radical change.. Academy of Management Journal 15-39
- Amis, J., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2004). Strategic change and the role of interests, power, and organizational capacity.. Journal of Sport Management 158-198.
iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Academic unit: | Bond Business School |
---|---|
Subject code: | EXEC71-031 |
Subject title: | Strategic People Management and Organisational Change |
Subject level: | Postgraduate |
Semester/Year: | May 2019 |
Credit points: | 10.000 |
Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
---|---|
Delivery mode: | Intensive |
Workload items: |
|
Attendance and learning activities: | Attendance at all scheduled sessions is expected. Students are expected to notify the instructor of any absences with as much advance notice as possible. |
Prescribed resources: | Journals
|
---|---|
iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
Requisites: |
Nil |
---|---|
Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge.
|
Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Explain the roles of strategic people management and change management in organisations, how they relate to other organisational functions and overall business performance.
- Use appropriate theory and concepts to analyse and recommend solutions to people and change related issues.
- Apply appropriate diagnostic tools, systems thinking and creative problem-solving to create effective change interventions.
- Create and assess a detailed plan to implement, measure and sustain a change management intervention.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed *Class Participation Preparation for and active participation in all class sessions. 10% Ongoing 1,2,3,4 Presentation§ Presentation of your strategic change proposal. 10% In Consultation 1,2,3,4 Project Report Personal change plan and evaluation. 40% In Consultation 1,2,3 Project§ Strategic change proposal including analysis of the need for change, solution criteria, recommendations and implementation plan. 40% In Consultation 1,2,3,4 - § Indicates group/teamwork-based assessment
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Class Participation | Preparation for and active participation in all class sessions. | 10% | Ongoing | 1,2,3,4 |
Presentation§ | Presentation of your strategic change proposal. | 10% | In Consultation | 1,2,3,4 |
Project Report | Personal change plan and evaluation. | 40% | In Consultation | 1,2,3 |
Project§ | Strategic change proposal including analysis of the need for change, solution criteria, recommendations and implementation plan. | 40% | In Consultation | 1,2,3,4 |
- § Indicates group/teamwork-based assessment
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
---|---|---|
Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Academic Integrity
University’s Academic Integrity Policy defines plagiarism as the act of misrepresenting as one’s own original work: another’s ideas, interpretations, words, or creative works; and/or one’s own previous ideas, interpretations, words, or creative work without acknowledging that it was used previously (i.e., self-plagiarism). The University considers the act of plagiarising to be a breach of the Student Conduct Code and, therefore, subject to the Discipline Regulations which provide for a range of penalties including the reduction of marks or grades, fines and suspension from the University.
Bond University utilises Originality Reporting software to inform academic integrity.Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, as per the Assessment Policy.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
If you have a disability, illness, injury or health condition that impacts your capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks, it is important you let us know your special requirements, early in the semester. Students will need to make an application for support and submit it with recent, comprehensive documentation at an appointment with a Disability Officer. Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Office at the earliest possible time, to meet staff and learn about the services available to meet your specific needs. Please note that late notification or failure to disclose your disability can be to your disadvantage as the University cannot guarantee support under such circumstances.
Additional subject information
There is no textbook. Readings and other resources for the course can be found on the course iLearn site. As part of the requirements for Business School quality accreditation, the Bond Business School employs an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Subject curriculum
-
Introduction
An overview of the course and an overview of the various types of change, the driving forces for change, the role of strategic people management.
-
Strategic People Management
Introduces the principles of and process of human resource management and the relevance of these principles in the context of managing strategic change.
-
Fundamentals of Change
Introduces open systems theory as a context for conceptualising individual and organisational change.
-
Planning Change
Examines several models of change management as a basis for identifying the underlying principles to plan and lead a successful change initiative.
-
Knowledge and Awareness
Approaches to understanding various aspects of the organisation and its systems are considered as well as the effects of change on different components of the organisation.
-
The Power to Change
The importance of power and influence is highlighted in relation to people management and change. Ways of enacting change through people is then examined within this context.
-
Commitment and Resistance
Explores the typical reactions to change and recommendations for how to effectively manage them. Ways of dealing with resistance to change and building commitment within the changing context are examined.
-
Implementing and Sustaining Change
The difficulties of implementing and sustaining change are examined in detail. The importance of systems thinking, redesigning roles, systems, processes, behaviours and culture to enact and sustain change is also considered.
-
Measuring Impact
Examines ways to measure the impact of change and strategic people initiatives. Ways of measuring impact and managing outcomes are also considered.