Corrections Practice

General Information

This subject will provide you with an in-depth understanding of contemporary correctional practices. The subject goes beyond foundational concepts and theories to explore the complex and evolving landscape of corrections, with a focus on applied learning.  You will engage with cutting-edge research, critically analyse policies and procedures, and participate in experiential learning activities to develop advanced skills applicable to correctional settings.

  • Academic unit: Faculty of Society & Design
    Subject code: CRIM71-211
    Subject title: Corrections Practice
    Subject level: Postgraduate
    Semester/Year: January 2025
    Credit points: 10.000
  • Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable
    Delivery mode: Standard
    Workload items:
    • Tutorial: x12 (Total hours: 12) - Weekly Tutorial
    • Forum: x12 (Total hours: 24) - Weekly Forum
    • Personal Study Hours: x12 (Total hours: 84) - Recommended study hours
    Attendance and learning activities: Attendance and participation relates to lectures and tutorial sessions where a student roll will be circulated each week. Students are required to attend 80% of the lecture and tutorials sessions and participation will be noted on a weekly basis.
  • Prescribed resources:

    Books

    • John Wooldredge,Paula H. Smith (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Prisons and Imprisonment. n/a, New York, NY Oxford University Press 745
    • Dominique Moran,Yvonne Jewkes,Kwan-Lamar Blount-Hill,Victor St. John (2022). The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Design. n/a, Switzerland Palgrave Macmillan
    • Philip Birch,Louise Sicard (2020). Prisons and Community Corrections. n/a, New York, NY Routledge 320
    After enrolment, students can check the Books and Tools area in iLearn for the full Resource List.
    iLearn@Bond & Email:

    iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications.

    Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student.

    To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Academic unit: Faculty of Society & Design
Subject code: CRIM71-211
Subject title: Corrections Practice
Subject level: Postgraduate
Semester/Year: January 2025
Credit points: 10.000

Enrolment requirements

Requisites:

Nil
Restrictions:

Nil

Assurance of learning

Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.

At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.

Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)

Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.

Find your program

Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)

On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:

  1. Develop strategies for the effective management of high-risk offenders, considering the principles of risk, need, and responsivity.
  2. Design and assess evidence-based rehabilitation programs for diverse offender populations.
  3. Identify and critically analyse emerging trends, challenges, and innovations in the field of corrections.
  4. Advocate for evidence-based and ethical correctional practices through effective communication strategies.

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment

The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.

  • Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed
    Assignment Students will prepare a policy briefing paper that addresses a critical challenge within contemporary corrections, proposing a layered evidence-based response to this identified challenge. The structure of this briefing paper will be discussed in forums and tutorials in the first few weeks of class. 35.00% Week 6 2,3,4
    Project Students will design and develop an evidence-based rehabilitation program targeted at a specific corrections population e.g. youth, minority group, sex offenders, women. The structure of this project will be discussed in lectures and tutorials in the first few weeks of class. 40.00% Week 13 1,2,4
    Small Group Learning Students will be assessed on class participation and engagement including leading a tutorial discussion of a critical issue that relates to contemporary corrections practice 25.00% Progressive 1,2,3,4
    • * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
    • C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.

  • Assessment criteria

    High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking.
    Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas.
    Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above.
    Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment.
    Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines.

    Quality assurance

    For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.

Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed
Assignment Students will prepare a policy briefing paper that addresses a critical challenge within contemporary corrections, proposing a layered evidence-based response to this identified challenge. The structure of this briefing paper will be discussed in forums and tutorials in the first few weeks of class. 35.00% Week 6 2,3,4
Project Students will design and develop an evidence-based rehabilitation program targeted at a specific corrections population e.g. youth, minority group, sex offenders, women. The structure of this project will be discussed in lectures and tutorials in the first few weeks of class. 40.00% Week 13 1,2,4
Small Group Learning Students will be assessed on class participation and engagement including leading a tutorial discussion of a critical issue that relates to contemporary corrections practice 25.00% Progressive 1,2,3,4
  • * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
  • C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.

Study Information

Submission procedures

Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.

Policy on late submission and extensions

A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.

Academic Integrity

Bond University‘s Student Code of Conduct Policy , Student Charter, Academic Integrity Policy and our Graduate Attributes guide expectations regarding student behaviour, their rights and responsibilities. Information on these topics can be found on our Academic Integrity webpage recognising that academic integrity involves demonstrating the principles of integrity (honesty, fairness, trust, professionalism, courage, responsibility, and respect) in words and actions across all aspects of academic endeavour.

Staff are required to report suspected misconduct. This includes all types of plagiarism, cheating, collusion, fabrication or falsification of data/content or other misconduct relating to assessment such as the falsification of medical certificates for assessment extensions. The longer term personal, social and financial consequences of misconduct can be severe, so please ask for help if you are unsure.

If your work is subject to an inquiry, you will be given an opportunity to respond and appropriate support will be provided. Academic work under inquiry will not be marked until the process has concluded. Penalties for misconduct include a warning, reduced grade, a requirement to repeat the assessment, suspension or expulsion from the University.

Feedback on assessment

Feedback on assessment will be provided to students according to the requirements of the Assessment Procedure Schedule A - Assessment Communication Procedure.

Whilst in most cases feedback should be provided within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, the Procedure should be checked if the assessment is linked to others or if the subject is a non-standard (e.g., intensive) subject.

Accessibility and Inclusion Support

Support is available to students where a physical, mental or neurological condition exists that would impact the student’s capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks. For effective support, special requirement needs should be arranged with the University in advance of or at the start of each semester, or, for acute conditions, as soon as practicable after the condition arises. Reasonable adjustments are not guaranteed where applications are submitted late in the semester (for example, when lodged just prior to critical assessment and examination dates).

As outlined in the Accessibility and Inclusion Policy, to qualify for support, students must meet certain criteria. Students are also required to meet with the Accessibility and Inclusion Advisor who will ensure that reasonable adjustments are afforded to qualifying students.

For more information and to apply online, visit BondAbility.

Additional subject information

This subject contains content that some students may find distressing, disturbing or culturally challenging. Students with concerns about the content of any subject are encouraged to discuss this with their teacher and consider how best to prepare themselves to study challenging material in a way that is appropriate for them.

Subject curriculum

Approved on: Oct 11, 2024. Edition: 1.2
Last updated: Oct 11, 2024
By browsing this site you accept that cookies are used to improve and personalise our services to you for a better experience on our website and for social activity. If you continue, we will assume that you agree to our use of cookies statement
I Agree