This subject is designed to support health professionals and those working in the health field to find, appraise, and apply evidence relevant to population, community and individual health needs. In this subject you will develop essential skills in evidence-based practice and policy, including framing relevant practice questions and searching to find research evidence addressing these questions. You will then be able to critically appraise research evidence based on an understanding of research study designs; and applying the results of those studies to individuals, communities and populations. This includes a foundational understanding of clinical epidemiology and biostatistics. These skills will enable you to independently evaluate the worth of newly proposed health policy and clinical management options.
|Academic unit:||Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine|
|Subject title:||Evidence Based Practice and Policy|
Delivery & attendance
|Attendance and learning activities:||Students will have access to 10 weeks of self-paced online modules, and are required to attend two x 2-day workshops on campus.|
|Prescribed resources:||No Prescribed resources. After enrolment, students can check the Books and Tools area in iLearn for the full Resource List.|
|[email protected] & Email:||[email protected] is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student.|
To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Formulate a clear question from a practice or health policy problem.
- Design and perform an efficient search to locate research addressing a focused question.
- Identify strengths and weaknesses in the design and methodology of research studies.
- Critically appraise a variety of research evidence and reflect on the quality of the evidence to inform practice.
- Accurately interpret summarise, and appropriately communicate the results of research studies to the target audience.
- Apply the principles of evidence based practice when drawing conclusions from research studies to inform recommendations for policy and/or practice.
|Presentation||Case presentation||30%||Week 5||1, 2, 3.|
|Computer-Aided Examination (Open)||Exam||30%||Week 10||1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.|
|Case Study||Case report||40%||Week 12||3, 4, 5, 6.|
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
|High Distinction||85-100||Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking.|
|Distinction||75-84||Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas.|
|Credit||65-74||Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above.|
|Pass||50-64||Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment.|
|Fail||0-49||Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines.|
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Students must check the [email protected] subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Policy on plagiarism
The University’s Academic Integrity Policy defines plagiarism as the act of misrepresenting as one's own original work: another’s ideas, interpretations, words, or creative works; and/or one’s own previous ideas, interpretations, words, or creative work without acknowledging that it was used previously (i.e., self-plagiarism). The University considers the act of plagiarising to be a breach of the Student Conduct Code and, therefore, subject to the Discipline Regulations which provide for a range of penalties including the reduction of marks or grades, fines and suspension from the University.
Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, as per the Assessment Policy.
If you have a disability, illness, injury or health condition that impacts your capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks, it is important you let us know your special requirements, early in the semester. Students will need to make an application for support and submit it with recent, comprehensive documentation at an appointment with a Disability Officer. Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Office at the earliest possible time, to meet staff and learn about the services available to meet your specific needs. Please note that late notification or failure to disclose your disability can be to your disadvantage as the University cannot guarantee support under such circumstances.
An overview of the benefits of EBP to individuals, patients and the broader public health.
Demonstrate the use of the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) method to formulate a question, and how to link that question to the appropriate study design.
Investigate sources of research evidence, and learn how to efficiently search in an electronic bibliographic database, using the PICO structure.
Critically appraise studies evaluating an intervention, with a particular focus to randomised controlled trials.
Critically appraise studies about diagnostic tests and understand the characteristics of a good diagnostic test, including test accuracy and precision.
Critically appraise studies that seek to find a cause or causal factor linked to a disease outcome, including studies about prognosis and risk factors.
Explore qualitative research as a methodology to collect and analyse words and ideas in order to understand the ‘meaning’ of personal experience.
Consider systematic reviews addressing different clinical questions (e.g. treatment, prognosis, prevalence) and critically appraise a systematic review using a rapid appraisal tool.
Explore how evidence could be applied in clinical practice, including the role of shared decision making and decision aids.
Explore the potential benefits, harms and limitations of practice guidelines, learn how to critically appraise a guideline.
Explore how the knowledge and skills gained in the subject could enable you to become an evidence-based practitioner.