Architecture Design Studio 5 engages students in complex urban scale projects that confront issues of architectural design in Civic and Urban scenarios of collective space. Projects shall require a greater deal of autonomous work by students who after four previous studios can direct a line of inquiry and sustain it through design work over a full semester. Projects in this subject shall involve complex public sites and institutional/civic programs. The creation of well developed, comprehensive design solutions that are informed by previous subjects is expected. There will be an urban studies component closely integrated within this studio. A focus on ""Global Cities"" will expose students to the complex issues of urbanisation and theories of city planning, by undertaking a comparative analysis of global cities, with an emphasis on the historical, cultural and geographical determinants of their urban morphology. Students will work individually and in teams through workshops and exercises to develop content awareness and application. Urban Studies lend a framework to the studio work.
|Academic unit:||Faculty of Society & Design|
|Subject title:||Architecture Design Studio 5|
Delivery & attendance
|Prescribed resources:||No Prescribed resources. After enrolment, students can check the Books and Tools area in iLearn for the full Resource List.|
|[email protected] & Email:||[email protected] is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student.|
To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
There are no co-requisites.
|Restrictions: ?|| This subject is not available to|
This subject is not available as a general elective. To be eligible for enrolment, the subject must be specified in the students’ program structure.
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Conceptual abstraction, research, analysis, understanding, identification and observation of site, context, people, precedents and scenarios in regard to one's design work (AIA Tertiary Education Policy category 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.2, 3.6.1, 3.6.2).
- Demonstrate an ability to develop articulate, considered, creative, thoughtful, climatically astute and contextual formal responses to architectural scenarios, particularly in relation to the urban context and medium/large-sized building scale (AIA Tertiary Education Policy category 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.6.1, 3.6.2).
- Develop a fundamental understanding of key organizational spatial and planning strategies in plan and section and their relationship to circulation, climate, structure, construction systems, materiality and programmatic adjacencies (AIA Tertiary Education Policy category 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.6.1, 3.6.2).
- Demonstrate an ability to develop and test a variety of sensitive design solutions in 2D and 3D, communicated via hand, digital, oral and written techniques (AIA Tertiary Education Policy category 3.7.1, 3.7.2).
- Demonstrate effective communication, collaborative and organisational skills in a group setting (AIA Tertiary Education Policy category 3.7.2).
- To develop understanding and knowledge of sensory aspects of architecture, and the phenomenology of experience paralleled by the measurement of the environment (AIA Tertiary Education Policy category 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.6.1 and 3.6.2).
- Develop and demonstrate an awareness of the broader cultural, social, environmental and political context in which architecture is practiced, including issues of local and global planning considerations and an understanding of the history of practice of urban design and issues of city planning (AIA Tertiary Education Policy 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.4.1, 3.5.1 and 3.6.1).
- Develop an understanding of cities and urban form, their morphology, scale, components, and interactions and the reasons for differences between urban conditions (AIA Tertiary Education Policy 3.1.1, 3.3.1, 3.5.1 and 3.6.1).
- Dissemination of urban research and analysis, and the resulting application of design principles at the scale of the city communicated via appropriate large-scale representation techniques (AIA Tertiary Education Policy 3.1.2, 3.2.2, 3.3.2, 3.4.2, 3.6.2 and 3.7.2).
|Class Participation ^||Urban Studies Class Participation||9%||Ongoing||5.|
|Design Project § ^||Studio Project 1||7%||Week 1||1, 4, 5, 8, 9.|
|Project ^||Urban Studies Project 1||3%||Week 2||4, 5, 7, 8, 9.|
|Project ^||Urban Studies Project 2||3%||Week 4||4, 7, 8, 9.|
|Design Project ^||Studio Project 2||21%||Week 4||2, 3, 4, 6.|
|Project ^||Urban Studies Project 3||3%||Week 6||4, 7, 8, 9.|
|Project ^||Urban Studies Project 4||3%||Week 8||4, 7, 8, 9.|
|Design Project ^||Studio Project 3||35%||Week 9||2, 3, 4, 6.|
|Project ^||Urban Studies Project 5||4.5%||Week 10||4, 7, 8, 9.|
|Evaluation Portfolio ^||Urban Studies Summative Portfolio||4.5%||Week 14*||4, 7, 8, 9.|
|Evaluation Portfolio ^||Summative Studio Portfolio||7%||Week 14*||1, 2, 3, 4, 6.|
- ^ Students must pass this assessment to pass the subject
- § Indicates group/teamwork-based assessment
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
|High Distinction||85-100||Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking.|
|Distinction||75-84||Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas.|
|Credit||65-74||Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above.|
|Pass||50-64||Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment.|
|Fail||0-49||Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines.|
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Students must check the [email protected] subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Policy on plagiarism
University’s Academic Integrity Policy defines plagiarism as the act of misrepresenting as one’s own original work: another’s ideas, interpretations, words, or creative works; and/or one’s own previous ideas, interpretations, words, or creative work without acknowledging that it was used previously (i.e., self-plagiarism). The University considers the act of plagiarising to be a breach of the Student Conduct Code and, therefore, subject to the Discipline Regulations which provide for a range of penalties including the reduction of marks or grades, fines and suspension from the University.
Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, as per the Assessment Policy.
If you have a disability, illness, injury or health condition that impacts your capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks, it is important you let us know your special requirements, early in the semester. Students will need to make an application for support and submit it with recent, comprehensive documentation at an appointment with a Disability Officer. Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Office at the earliest possible time, to meet staff and learn about the services available to meet your specific needs. Please note that late notification or failure to disclose your disability can be to your disadvantage as the University cannot guarantee support under such circumstances.